Difference between revisions of "Omega WIP page"

Revision as of 10:59, 3 December 2015

Overview

The current active thinking of the Omega structure is that it is based on 6 key questions, and from the perspectives of at least two stakeholders with respect to MBSE:

• An individual systems engineer;
• An engineering manager (with responsibility for a project, or organisational unit / department / function).

Current generic questions are proposed to be:

1. Why should I adopt MBSE?
2. What does MBSE mean for my role?
3. Where (activity area, disciplines level of decomp) do I employ MBSE?
4. When (temporal e.g. life cycle phase, criteria), should MBSE be employed?
5. Who else need to participate in MBSE activities?
6. How do I make use of MBSE on my project?

So what we see below are two subsections, for each of these two primary roles, and with an elaborated response for each of the 6 questions, for each role.

Details

Individual Systems Engineer

1 Why should I adopt MBSE?

(elaborated response)

2 What does MBSE mean for my role?

(elaborated response)

Formatting for following needs to be revised...

1. Where (activity area, disciplines level of decomp) do I employ MBSE?
2. When (temporal e.g. life cycle phase, criteria), should MBSE be employed?
3. Who else need to participate in MBSE activities?
4. How do I make use of MBSE on my project?

An engineering manager

1. Why should I adopt MBSE?
2. What does MBSE mean for my role?
3. Where (activity area, disciplines level of decomp) do I employ MBSE?
4. When (temporal e.g. life cycle phase, criteria), should MBSE be employed?
5. Who else need to participate in MBSE activities?
6. How do I make use of MBSE on my project?